r/worldnews
•
u/UnlikelyRabbit4648
•
11d ago
•
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Russia fumes NATO 'trying to inflict defeat on us' after tanks sent to Ukraine Russia/Ukraine
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/russia-fumes-nato-trying-to-inflict-defeat-on-us-after-tanks-sent-to-ukraine/ar-AA16IGIw18.4k
u/ClassBShareHolder
11d ago
•
“Inflict defeat”
Playing the victim while being the aggressor.
“Stop hitting back, you’re hurting me!”
4.4k
u/ShadedPsyche 11d ago
Calling for sympathy because your arm hurts on account of stabbing someone fifty times.
→ More replies1.1k
u/Howhighwefly 11d ago
Your back hurt my hand while I was stabbing you in the back.
→ More replies324
1.6k
u/niberungvalesti 11d ago
Typical bullying narcissist behavior to flip the morality of the situation back at the victims.
"Stop hurting me! I'm only hurting you because I
love youwant to install a puppet government and steal your valuable lands and resources!"1.7k
u/OptimalFlight101 11d ago •
![]()
![]()
![]()
Remember when I told you I wouldn't invade you in exchange for your nuclear weapons. Wasn't that a funny joke?
-Russia
→ More replies599
→ More replies764
u/TheApathyParty3 11d ago
It's more sinister than being a bullying narcissist. Since Soviet times, Russia and the KGB's strategy has always been to befuddle the truth and skew any information that people get. They've been doing it for over a century.
Putin's an old KGB agent and he's using the old playbook, but I honestly think he's so old and geriatric that he doesn't understand that the world doesn't work in that same way in the modern information age. Maybe in Russia where he controls practically everything, but this sort of thing just sounds comical to the rest of us. The guy is still living in the USSR c. 1975.
326
u/BackOld3468 11d ago
Putin's an old KGB agent and he's using the old playbook, but I honestly think he's so old and geriatric that he doesn't understand that the world doesn't work in that same way in the modern information age.
Completely agree on this one. Planning their invasion for several days just proves this. This guy definitely needs an updated OS. Unfortunately, this will never happen since his KGB school just "seals" everything he knows not leaving a chance for the update. Sad though.
→ More replies→ More replies222
u/guyincognito121 11d ago
Unfortunately, we do actually have Americans (and people in other countries with free access to information) walking around who actually get taken in by this stuff--and not just a few nuts here and there. So I'm not sure that he's really as out of touch as you say.
→ More replies113
807
u/ukie7 11d ago •
![]()
The problem is ruzzia is so stuck ideologically in the past that for them Ukraine is theirs, and anyone going against them is in the wrong and the aggressor.
They actually believe what they are spewing. Their regime and most of their people.
→ More replies→ More replies79
10.7k
u/FOXHOUND9000
11d ago
•
Yes. That's the point. You fucking idiots.
1.3k
u/Cy41995 11d ago
It's only been 30 years, did they already forget how the Cold War worked?
265
u/Fordiman 11d ago
Can't wait for Swan Lake 2.0.
→ More replies236
u/OnlyRoke 11d ago
The digital age really surprised us all with how Cold War 2 is going.
How long until the eBay of Pigs?
→ More replies→ More replies1.9k
u/Dealan79 11d ago •
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think Cold War 2.0 really has surprised them. Just a few years ago they had a US President, a number of his staff, and several Senators and Congressmen in their back pocket. They also had a former German Chancellor literally on the payroll, an oligarch's son nominated for a position in the English House of Lords, allies in growing far-right parties throughout Europe, and what they thought was a reliable puppet government in Hungary that could block any NATO action even in the worst case scenario everything else failed. Europe was heavily dependent on Russian oil. They probably thought that they had enough diplomatic, clandestine, and financial leverage to march in unopposed, and once that didn't happen it triggered shocked Pikachu faces.
977
u/BloodshotPizzaBox 11d ago
Just a few years ago they had a US President, a number of his staff, and several Senators and Congressmen in their back pocket.
Also at least one highly-placed counterintelligence agent in the FBI, from the looks of things. Allegedly.
→ More replies327
u/JesusSavesForHalf 11d ago
Again. FFS.
160
u/Risley 11d ago
Yeah but look at our intelligence so far on this war. It looks like we’ve got quite a few paid informants as well. Such is life in the spy world.
→ More replies32
u/Januarywednesday 11d ago
Which German Chancellor?
→ More replies93
u/Dealan79 11d ago
Gerhard Schröder, at least until May 2022.
→ More replies72
u/Atomic-Decay 11d ago
Unbelievable that he stayed on the board until May. Three months of war crimes and he couldn’t give a flying Fuck. Only left because he had no choice. Disgusting
→ More replies→ More replies220
u/andrewnormous 11d ago
The scariest part is some of what you said is still true or can become true again very easily.
→ More replies27
u/Neville_Lynwood 11d ago
Gonna be at least a little harder in the future. This failure in Ukraine is being very effectively recorded by countless methods and stored in great detail on the internet. So much of Russia's failure is so clearly on display.
It's much harder for people to genuinely push for supporting Russia in light of all that.
→ More replies253
u/alpacafox 11d ago
Actually Lloyd Austin said it best: We need to make sure Russia won't be able to do something like this again.
→ More replies→ More replies1.7k
11d ago
[deleted]
1.7k
u/Kenaston 11d ago
I want Russia to lose.
847
203
u/UglyInThMorning 11d ago
Yeah, like if they just leave they will 100 percent try to do it again. Shatter their military and it’ll at least take longer before they get all invade-y again. And it makes a good example to other countries that may want to start shit.
→ More replies49
u/JarlVarl 11d ago
tbh the best scenario would be that russia just leaves ukraine and moldova (I wish Georgia as well, but they're so far away for most of us I don't see it happening), they join nato and eu, meaning russia can't do shit even if they rebuild their army, which will take them decades (their economy won't be the same to spend on all that equipment and even if they build them they would have to start from scrath for some parts because they can't be imported due to the restrictions (which we hopefully will keep).
→ More replies→ More replies302
u/DoubleSolid2522 11d ago
Russia has already lost. The us and Europe will support ukraine indefinitely. Russia will crack in time and go back to the dark ages.
→ More replies62
110
u/Mixels 11d ago
I suspect the Pentagon is all sorts of interested in costing them as much as possible on their way out. US military has long seen Russia as an enemy, and I can't imagine they'd miss an opportunity to beat them to a pulp by proxy.
→ More replies225
u/DoomGoober 11d ago
Destroying billions of dollars of Russian field equipment: check.
Destroying large portions of Russia's air force: Check.
Killing Russian military commanders: Check.
Killing Wagner group mercenaries and getting their commanders to commit war crimes so Wagner group can be sanctioned: Check.
Killing lots of Russians of fighting age that have not fled: Check.
Possibly making it so Putin won't win his fiftieth term in office: Check.
No active duty American soldiers coming home in body bags: Check.
Cynical but a military accountant would say that America is getting a pretty good deal.
150
u/ITaggie 11d ago
Cynical but a military accountant would say that America is getting a pretty good deal.
This is what a lot of people online don't get. We aren't just funding Ukraine to help a country defend their sovereignty, but to absolutely devastate the Russian military while testing out the equipment we designed specifically to counter Russia, all without costing NATO lives (which might make it politically untenable). This is a fantastic opportunity for NATO.
83
u/aspirationalcarguy 11d ago
We get to do both which is awesome. This is one of those rare times where moral high ground coincides with smiting your enemy. Doesn't happen often. Glad we are helping. I hated amassing all that seemingly superfluous military hardware. Now happy as a clam to see it being used for its index purpose.
Just wish the poor Ukrainians and even the poor dumb Russian conscripts didn't have to die en masse for one guys delusions.
→ More replies60
u/Infernalism 11d ago
There's a clip from Babylon 5, a great sci-fi show btw, where one of the politicians there says something in regards to rallying alien races to the defense of Earth: "Politics and morality on the same side? That doesn't happen every day!"
→ More replies45
u/SomeGuyNamedPaul 11d ago
And what we're "spending" in all this is the existing equipment that was bought a long time ago for the express purpose of being used against Russia and their sphere.
→ More replies→ More replies39
u/Mothringer 11d ago
It's also a really effective advertisement to drive demand for American weapon systems among the countries we are willing to sell to.
→ More replies79
u/joepjah 11d ago
You can add: 'fighting awar by proxy so we can safely "fieldtest" our equipment against Russian equipment as well.' This is a field day for the Western military industrial complex.
→ More replies214
11d ago
I want Russia to face an utter defeat, simply withdrawing from Ukraine is not enough. They have to be so weakened that they cannot invade another country again. They must also return the hundreds of thousands of kidnapped Ukrainian children. Ukraine can be rebuilt without Russia paying reparations but the most precious and invaluable thing of all is the the Ukrainian children.
→ More replies→ More replies101
u/notb665 11d ago
To be frank, the West surely wants Russia to lose. And not only that, we want them to lose slowly. It’s boiling the Frog. Hit them too early too hard they may have pulled their leg back and tried it again some ten years later. But now those legs get slowly crushed to the point of Russia not being able to fight another war in this century.
→ More replies
23.6k
u/Lofteed
11d ago
•
Nothing escapes the keen inquiring minds at the Kremlin
2.5k
u/RobertJ93 11d ago
It took them months to come up with this assessment too.
→ More replies816
u/DarthNihilus_501st 11d ago
I can't wait for them to publish their research paper and thesis on this matter as well.
314
→ More replies112
4.7k
u/budakat 11d ago •
![]()
![]()
Russia: Nothing goes over my head. My reflexes are too fast. I would catch it.
→ More replies1.9k
u/m4inbrain 11d ago •
![]()
I, too, am extraordinarily humble.
→ More replies720
u/MindlessFail 11d ago
Do not EVER call me a thesaurus!
→ More replies503
u/N1CET1M 11d ago
I’ve mastered the ability of standing so incredibly still that I become invisible to the eye.
→ More replies333
u/Nixplosion 11d ago •
![]()
I have Famously huge turds!
→ More replies162
431
u/SchighSchagh 11d ago
And are they admitting NATO would absolutely stomp them in a direct war if mere NATO tanks are an existential threat?
165
→ More replies97
u/Ippus_21 11d ago
They might as well. It's not like everyone knows it now or anything, after their main advance got stomped by some under-equipped Ukrainians in the early days of the invasion.
→ More replies83
u/nightwing2000 11d ago
They couldn't even take Kharkiv, 20 miles from the Russian border.
Plus their brilliant planning and smart officers - "What's the problem with us digging trenches and raising dust around Chernobyl? Everything seems fine, nice and quiet."
→ More replies38
1.1k
u/CriticalPolitical 11d ago
Putin: “What?! The Ukrainians are fighting back?! They are trying to make us lose on purpose!”
Yes man: “Insightful observation, sir.”
→ More replies358
u/jaxonya 11d ago
"Abusive alcoholic boyfriend cries when her bigger, older brothers show up to beat the shit out of him. More news at 8"
→ More replies440
u/wrosecrans 11d ago •
![]()
The brothers aren't even showing up. We are just saying that they can borrow a baseball bat and have $20.
→ More replies162
796
u/herberstank 11d ago
Intellectually speaking they've gotta be scraping the bottom of the vodka barrel at this point. Anyone with multiple functioning neurons has bailed out long ago.
361
u/BisquickNinja 11d ago
Or they have been ousted, sent to the gulag or taken care of....
→ More replies→ More replies138
u/Aceticon 11d ago
Or keep their mouths shut and go along with whatever the "great leader" says as that's the only intelligent way to keep their snout in that specific trough and not end up defenestrated or suicided with two bullets to the back of the head.
→ More replies69
u/TheDocJ 11d ago
That is itself a very risky strategy - Great Leaders are seldom prepared to accept responsibility when their dumb ideas get the predictable results. "Comrade, you said that this was a great idea, and look how it hs turned out. You are the weakest link, goodbye."
→ More replies37
u/Aceticon 11d ago
I reckon they use the very same "shit only flows downwards" method as the "great leader" and blame their own underlings for the flawed implementations of all those otherwise masterful plans...
→ More replies260
→ More replies68
9.5k
u/Kewenfu
11d ago
•
Russia can still CHOOSE to leave Ukraine and avoid defeat.
4.2k
u/PretendsHesPissed 11d ago edited 10d ago
Nah. They were defeated when they failed to hold their precious airport, failed to capture Kyiv, and poisoned themselves in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.
russia is the new "This is what winning looks like."
2.1k
u/Ferris_Wheel_Skippy 11d ago
russia is the new "This is what winning looks like."
honestly, as someone who has studied Russian history...this has kind of always been how they promote themselves lol
it's a huge reason why Victory Day (the end of WW2) is a BIG deal. Probably the biggest holiday after New Year's. They need to tell everyone around them who cares that they were the "ultimate winners" in World war 2
if you look at their military record, it's really an ongoing clusterfuck of hilariously pathetic military botch-ups: Crimean War, Russo-Japanese War, early parts of WW1, the Invasion of Afghanistan, the first Cechen War. They obviously had some level of success since they were a world power for a while, but holy fuck have they had some major screw-ups.
1.3k
u/pulzeguy 11d ago
The good ol Baltic fleet journey to Japan is still my favorite Russian military misadventure
→ More replies460
u/HoneyBadgeSwag 11d ago
Go on…
1.2k
u/Lynthelia 11d ago edited 11d ago •
![]()
They sailed their fleet from the Baltic to Vladivostok to fight the Japanese. On the way they shot at a British fishing boat because they "thought it Japanese" (in the Baltic???) which got them banned from using the Suez.
In the end, they sailed halfway around the world just to get absolutely fucking stomped by Japan in quite possibly the most one-sided naval battle ever, then had to crawl several thousand miles back home in utter defeat.
(E: As several have mentioned, there's hilarious parts I didn't recount and parts I got a little wrong just reciting the basics from memory. Look it up, the Battle of Tsushima. It's a pretty crazy moment in history.)
538
u/jdeo1997 11d ago edited 11d ago
It was the Baltic (no casualties) and the North Sea (2 british fishermen were killed and an unnarmed fishing boat sunk at the cost of a russian orthodox priest and at least one russian sailer also being killed by friendly fire), with the latter costing them access from the Suez
544
u/thingamajig1987 11d ago
So their k/d was 2/2 against an unarmed opponent? Damn lol
240
u/cgn-38 11d ago
The whole voyage is odd. If they made a movie out of it. No one would believe it.
→ More replies124
77
u/SnooRecipes4434 11d ago
They were very lucky that that Britain did not declare war and sink them as they were allied with Japan at the time. It was a close run thing as well.
From the wiki, The Royal Navy prepared for war, with 28 battleships of the Home Fleet being ordered to raise steam and prepare for action, while British cruiser squadrons shadowed the Russian fleet as it made its way through the Bay of Biscay and down the coast of Portugal.
→ More replies30
u/THElaytox 11d ago
My favorite part of the wiki: "greater loss of life was avoided only because the Russian gunnery was highly inaccurate"
→ More replies→ More replies49
u/restre145555 11d ago
No no no its so much worse than that. if memory serves several ships crashed into one another at launch in an utter cluster fuck and took it one cruiser off the bat the British fishing boat incident was not the only fishing boat incident mostly though they missed the boats so no actions were taken and to top it all off The fishing boat incident was far from the only friendly fire incident. My favorite is when approaching Japan the admiral in charge decided to put together a target practice drill by having a ship tow a moving target on a VERY long tether somehow they managed to never hit the target and continuously hit the ship pulling it.
→ More replies24
u/JustASFDCGuy 11d ago
That "mistake" sounds suspiciously like, "I'm all hopped up on Mountain Dew and I just want to shoot something."
19
u/Obi_wan_pleb 11d ago edited 11d ago
They didn't lose access to the suez canal. The Russians though that the newer ships wouldn't be able to pass through the canal due to their draught and they split the fleet.
The older ships went via the suez canal and the newer ships rounded the cape of good hope https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tsushima
326
11d ago
The best part imo is that they shot up a number of civilian ships en route to Japan because "what if they're Japanese" but when they reached Japan they immediately revealed themselves to a Japanese patrol boat because "what if it's not Japanese" and then got annihilated as a result.
60
u/MINIMAN10001 10d ago
Honestly this whole story was such peak stupidity every single step of the way wondering "I guess that's what happens if you send out one of your dumbest on a long mission" who knows maybe they became delirious during their journey due to malnutrition and became unable to mentally function?
→ More replies421
u/pwnedbyscope 11d ago
You left out the best part, the Russians were scared shirtless as you said of Japanese torpedo boats so they shot at two fishing trawlers who were sent to deliver a message to the admiral of the fleet, before the even left the Baltic. Then they shot at small group british fishing vessels off the coast of Britain actually managing to sink one, while also damaging two of thier own.
Anyway, the best part after sailing around Africa having a few more incidents of opening fire on random fishing vessels along the way the fleet approached japan. Finally they came across an actual Japanese ship, who they promptly determined to be Russian. Completely revealing themselves to and then they were stomped by Japanese navy.
Also forgot to mention since they were kinda upset about having to sail around Africa they decided it would be a good idea to try and brighten their spirits, by stopping at Madagascar and bringing aboard a bunch of random animals including a fucking crocodile, and a venomous snake who bit a senior officer. And that's not even all the crazy shit that happened on this dumb voyage
→ More replies149
u/THElaytox 11d ago
Good Lord, this definitely deserves to have a movie made and it needs to be slapstick comedy along the lines of Death of Stalin
36
→ More replies84
u/czPsweIxbYk4U9N36TSE 11d ago edited 11d ago
Wow, you greatly undersold just how fucking hilariously incompetent they were
Some highlights: They fought a "battle" against some British fishing boats, mistaking them for Japanese torpedo boats.... on the other side of the world from the war... and they lost that battle... and that's about the most competent they were in their entire voyage.
→ More replies253
u/olhonestjim 11d ago
→ More replies57
u/bewarethesloth 11d ago
Hahaha loved that, thanks for posting
61
u/AikiYun 11d ago
For an indepth 2 part version, check out Drachinifel's Voyage of the Damned video.
→ More replies25
→ More replies214
u/Redd575 11d ago
The Japanese fleet destroyed Russia's entire Pacific fleet and lost something silly like 3 people (people, not vessels). My exact stats may be off but it is considered one of if not the most one sided major naval engagement.
414
u/GenerikDavis 11d ago edited 11d ago
You're a bit hyperbolic, but the actual Japanese losses are so minimal that the difference between 3 dead and the real damage is like a rounding error when comparing to the Russians.
117 dead, torpedo boats sunk for the Japanese. That's 255 tonnage in ships sunk.
5,045 dead, 26 ships sunk or captured including 11 battleships of various classes for the Russians. 143,232 tonnage in ships sunk.
43 times the casualties and 560+ times the tonnage lost. And I can't stress enough how devastating losing battleships was in those days. A battleship was a huge investment at the time. Not quite on the magnitude of if the US lost an aircraft carrier today, but maybe like 1/3 that.
This is arguably in the top 5 most decisive naval battles of all time, and yeah, very possibly the most lopsided. It was also the first major defeat of a major European power by a non-European power in modern history.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tsushima
E: Typo
→ More replies74
u/dragonatorul 11d ago
The only similarly lopsided battles I can think of are the early Rome-Carthage naval battles.
72
u/palmtwee 11d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Manila_Bay
One American sailor died… of illness…
→ More replies→ More replies49
127
u/spinfip 11d ago
You're skipping straight to the battle. The journey of the Baltic Fleet to its eventual resting place off Korea is an incredible story.
→ More replies58
u/vonindyatwork 11d ago
Yup. Nearly lost a battle to unarmed fisherman off the coast of Britain barely a few days into the trip..
45
u/spinfip 11d ago
And that was before they got into the morphine and put crocodiles on the ship!
→ More replies66
u/berubem 11d ago
A lot of the Russian fleet blew up on their own underwater mines, right? Including the ship with the only map of sais mine field, if I remember correctly. Pretty big screw up.
→ More replies→ More replies42
u/whoami_whereami 11d ago
Japan lost 3 torpedo boats and 116 men at the Battle of Tsushima. Russia lost 8 battleships (and a whole bunch of smaller vessels) and 5000 men.
Although aside from this one engagement the whole war wasn't quite as lopsided. Over all Japan actually lost slightly more men than Russia did, and they lost two battleships as well.
TBF though, back then noone in the west thought that Japan would win this war (and probably not even Japan itself given that they offered a favorable peace deal to Russia early on). Russia had the fourth largest navy in the world at the time, after the UK, France and Germany. While Japan had only fought its first modern war a few years prior against Qing dynasty China which had failed in its attempts to modernize its military in the wake of the Opium Wars (where they had been completely subjugated by Britain and France).
→ More replies159
u/KnucklesMcGee 11d ago
Russia is pretty butt hurt when someone else gets a lifeline of "Lend Lease" supplies.
→ More replies162
u/Jeynarl 11d ago
Don’t forget their late flagship of the black sea fleet, the Moskva
166
u/pulzeguy 11d ago
which was willingly sent out with almost all of its missile defense systems down, as well as the radar switched off due to being unable to use it while using communications.
Those 18-20 year old conscripts in the lower deck didn’t even know they were being attacked until their quarters were on fire and flooding.
Death to Putin.
82
u/TimeZarg 11d ago
Lazerpig did a nice video summarizing just how fucked the Moskva was from a performance standpoint. Engines couldn't run at full, insufficient firefighting equipment, the missile defense and radar problems you mentioned, on and on. It's amazing the thing wasn't sunk earlier, TBH.
→ More replies→ More replies47
u/Thurwell 11d ago
There's a good chance no one on that ship knew they were being attacked until the missile hit. Russian ships don't have any automated defense systems or alarms. Some conscript has to be actively looking at the screens and notice the missiles coming in. If he's off getting coffee or dozed off, nobody has any warning. A system which works fine during drills when you know you're about to be attacked, but is pretty worthless when you need to be vigilant for months on end.
→ More replies109
u/pm-me-ur-fav-undies 11d ago
Moskva got told to fuck off by some dudes guarding an island, and she proceeded to sink while supposedly carrying a piece of the true cross onboard, all while fighting a country that scuttled it's only sizable ship at the beginning of the invasion.
I think Moskva's story is a good encapsulation of how this war has been going.
→ More replies147
u/Grokent 11d ago
Russia is currently losing a naval war to a country that has no navy.
→ More replies61
u/shorey66 11d ago
A country that built Russia's navy for them and also has no navy of their own.
→ More replies→ More replies74
u/MostJudgment3212 11d ago
That would count as defeat for Putin, he wouldn’t survive it. Russia is a ruthless country. He will sacrifice millions and will never give up.
→ More replies
2.0k
u/davew111 11d ago
Putin said Russian weapons are "decades ahead" of anything NATO has, so why are they fussed about a few dozen tanks?
→ More replies561
u/iiSamJ 11d ago
Because in reality they are using cold war weapons just to get by and the Kremlin knows they don't stand a chance in a real boots on ground style war.
→ More replies433
u/Astyanax1 11d ago
until they invaded Ukraine, the west was fearful of their army. now, the west laughs. hell, the Canadian Army could likely tell Moscow within a week at this point
→ More replies218
u/kevInquisition 11d ago
Don't fuck with the Canadians. They might seem nice on the surface but give them a hockey stick and it's game over for you
→ More replies135
u/crathis 11d ago
If you want to learn some fun info, look up Canadian troops reputations in WW2
→ More replies
2.9k
u/Wigu90 11d ago edited 11d ago
Hey, you can always get the fuck out and call it a tie, you know?
It'll still be embarrassing as shit, but probably better than what's coming.
→ More replies639
u/TopFloorApartment 11d ago
They could even have a big victory speech on their aircraft carrier with a Mission Accomplished banner and call it a win. It's not like their domestic media would report anything different.
164
→ More replies23
1.4k
u/smilesandlaughter
11d ago
•
A badly paraphrased joke from Zelenksy himself!
"2 russian friend meet at a bar after a year apart. One of them, a priest has been away on a religious mission the last year.
He asks his friend who remained in Russia, what on earth is going on, I hear there is a war?
His friend replies, yes, we're at war with NATO! We've lost thousands of tanks, tens of thousands of soldiers and our economy is tanking!
Oh shit exclaims the priest and what about NATO?
"They haven't showed up yet"
235
u/iwellyess 11d ago
That is a damned good joke
→ More replies126
u/SomeoneStoleMyBacon 11d ago
wasn't he a comedian before becoming a politician?
→ More replies41
u/logi 11d ago
He was and here is a great podcast episode from well before the war about his background
https://www.npr.org/2019/12/04/784746019/whose-ukraine-is-it-anyway
They did a repeat with context more recently, but I'm not finding it right now. "Please comment below".
Also, the TV series that made him president in a weird recursive life imitation of art is on Netflix. I've only watched one episode but it was good.
→ More replies→ More replies132
902
u/Novel_Ad927
11d ago
•
If they had kept their shabby, rapist, looting, civilian killing army at home there would have been no sanctions, no dead soldiers. And they could still threaten and bluster, but not now that we see what a shit show they are..
→ More replies146
382
u/xavia91 11d ago
"hurr durr the west sending tanks won't change anything, we will still destroy Ukraine"
"Wait why did you send them tanks? thats not fair!!!"
→ More replies44
u/Incompatibert 11d ago
"We have already destroyed 200 of the 100 tanks the West has sent into Ukraine that are unfairly beating the shit out of us."
1.4k
u/rldogamusprime 11d ago
Russia for the last ten years - "We're at war with the West!!!"
Russia now - "Stop trying to defeat us!!"
→ More replies272
u/ObjectivelyAOK 11d ago
This is key. Putin has made it absolutely clear - for more than a decade - he views NATO as a strategic challenge and wanted to overturn the US dominated world order. More recently, the Russian government has framed the war as being against NATO and barely acknowledged Ukraine as an adversary with its own national and strategic interests. Now they feign shock that NATO aims to defeat them by supporting Ukraine. Welcome to the Russian world. A crumbling former imperial with an economy the size of Spain seeking to dictate Ukraine‘s political future and redimension the world order to suit their purpose.
→ More replies19
u/Stwike_Him_Centuwion 11d ago
100% agree.
I just always wonder when I see such comments if (in this case, Spain) sees these comparisons and says “Our economy is as big as Russia’s!”, or if they’re more like “C’mon, guys, you’re making us feel like crap over here.”
→ More replies
739
u/Greedy-Knowledge6043 11d ago
Arming Ukraine with back room weaponry has been probably the cheapest way for NATO and “the west” to effectively cut the Russian military at their knees. And they’re doing so without sending a single soldier or firing a single round.
→ More replies321
u/Killerderp 11d ago
And a lot of that gear is stuff they consider "old" from my understanding. That's the wild thing to me.
→ More replies276
u/Nightsong 11d ago
The Leopard and Abrams tanks are from the 70s and 80s while HIMARS are from the 90s. Even the Patriot missile defense system is from the 80s. Mind you, all of that tech has been upgraded over the years but the original foundations are decades old.
→ More replies119
1.0k
11d ago
This statement from Russia is dumb even by Russian standards. Like, what did they think the world was doing? Secretly supporting Russia by sending weapons to Ukraine????
It’s almost like they put out the first thing that comes to their minds becuase they’ve run out of anything important to say and just want to post to stay relevant.
86
u/smmstv 11d ago
The intended audience isn't us, it's their own people. Kinda gives you a glimpse into what the propaganda is telling them.
→ More replies→ More replies254
u/TheMindfulnessShaman 11d ago
It's just them calling the 'complaint center' and airing a list of grievances that are entirely self-inflicted and anachronistically barbaric.
"We just wanted to invade as far west as we could and make it like us!"
"Why are you soo Russophobic?!"
→ More replies93
444
87
u/Hayes77519 11d ago
"It's almost like you don't want us to kill these innocent people? I mean, JEEZ."
232
u/Furitaurus 11d ago
They do realise that even if nato as an organisation didn’t exist we would all still be helping Ukraine as we have currently been? Nothing we have done has been under the banner of NATO, it’s either been as individual nations or as the eu.
→ More replies48
59
u/RedLion40 11d ago edited 11d ago
Are these people literally insane? That's like a bully saying "They're fighting back! They're not supposed to do that!"
→ More replies
62
u/koshgeo 11d ago
Day 335 of the 3-day special military operation
Dear diary:
I think western countries may be trying to inflict defeat on us.
Also, I'm getting suspicious that the Ukrainian people may not want to become part of Russia.
→ More replies
58
u/Verypoorman 11d ago
The thing is, Russia is defeated. They just haven’t come to grips with it yet. They can’t rid them of the delusion that they can come out on top of this.
→ More replies
255
u/DeeHawk 11d ago
What else would be the point of sending weapons? It's not like there is another incentive. Stating the obvious, but I guess it beats the obvious lies.
On Monday, Moscow's foreign minister Sergey Lavrov warned that Russia and the West are no longer in a "hybrid war" but almost a "real one".
Yeah that must be real scary for them, considering it wasn't supposed to be war.
Drooling idiots.
89
u/dalerian 11d ago
Russia has shown it can’t beat Ukraine. Why does it think it has a chance against Ukraine + NATO at the same time?
→ More replies→ More replies120
u/maybehelp244 11d ago edited 11d ago
As the joke goes in this "real war".
Two Russian men are standing at the bus stop when the first says to the other, "Have you heard?! We are at war with NATO! We've already lost 120,000 men!"
The second responds, "Oh my God, that's awful! How many has NATO lost?!"
The first says, "They haven't showed up yet."
→ More replies
46
u/noxii3101 11d ago
Russia chose to invade Ukraine for no reason other than territorial expansion. The world looked away the myriad of other times Russia has needlessly invaded former soviet states to shore up obedience to the Kremlin. Not this time.
Russia can leave Ukraine any time it wants to. They are the ones prolonging this war. The UN charter is pretty clear - you just don't get to claim another countries land because you think you have historical right to it.
→ More replies
563
6.6k
u/BrightSkies42
11d ago
edited 11d ago
•
This was apparent from the first dollar of aid we sent.
Edit: I did not expect this comment to blow up so much. I just like making snarky remarks about adversarial nations like Russia.
Edit2: Thank you, kind Leprechaun!
2.9k
u/UnlikelyRabbit4648 11d ago
Honestly, this wasn't some big secret...nearly every country in the world has committed to saying "Russia cannot be allowed to win".
The writing was literally written on the wall and projected into the sky using a bat signal.
684
261
u/kyel566 11d ago
To Russia’s defense they lie so much they assume others do to
→ More replies29
u/SkyNetIsNow 11d ago
Also, they got off easy when they invaded and annexed territory in 2014. They expected a similar response when they launched the full invasion last year.
→ More replies21
806
u/Calavar 11d ago
It's all about the messaging at home. The war is a complete and utter humiliation of the Russian military by a country with 1/5 the population and 1/10 the military budget, but if you squint hard enough and reframe it as Russia just barely holding on against the full weight of NATO, all the sudden it doesn't look nearly as bad.
508
u/nav17 11d ago
Which is still baffling because Russia and its shills have been saying they can crush NATO in weeks. Yet with every setback they blame NATO and cry about how they're losing because of NATO. To the autocratic mind I guess two realities are possible.
48
u/GarrettGSF 11d ago
Well, just a couple of days ago, Putin‘s favourite „journalist“ said that Russia should occupy Berlin once more and Paris as well for sending aid to Ukraine. And to never leave there again. Oh, and also to re-occupy (parts of) Finland to keep them and Sweden in check. And to oust all American troops from Europe.
Yes, they are completely delusional.
→ More replies778
u/ConditionOne 11d ago •
![]()
Nah, they know exactly what they're doing. "The enemy is both weak and strong" is one of the pillars of propaganda these days. I mean, look at the rhetoric used toward illegal immigrants. They're so hardworking that they're stealing your jobs but are also somehow lazy freeloaders who provide no benefit to the system.
→ More replies186
u/robodrew 11d ago
"The enemy is both weak and strong" is one of the pillars of propaganda these days.
Been that way for a long time. It's exactly the rhetoric that Hitler used.
→ More replies79
116
u/GourangaPlusPlus 11d ago •
![]()
To the autocratic mind I guess two realities are possible.
"Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them" - George Orwell, 1984
→ More replies32
u/IglooDweller 11d ago
The equation is even worse than that. Remember that for all the equipment we sent, none of the Ukrainian soldier has the level of training with them that the NATO soldier would have. So if Russia is barely managing to hold against people with good weapon but without training, think about what would happen is the soldier are proefficient with the weapon they use and have had more than a crash course with them…
→ More replies→ More replies49
u/cambios_dios 11d ago
They are not even fighting a full strength NATO. Its NATO lending equipment to Ukraine. If Russia did have to fight NATO full on, it wouldn't last any more than a few days at best. The only thing that would keep Russia in the game would be their willingness to throw bodies onto the battle field.
→ More replies→ More replies31
u/venomandvaccine 11d ago
But he's not the full weight of NATO, NATO is just breathing and tickling them.
→ More replies35
u/Evoluxman 11d ago
Of course, but Russian propaganda frames it as a war against all of NATO to make their defeats "less humiliating"
If nukes weren't at play Russia would have already been Serbia'd and forced to surrender, NATO forces are overwhelmingly stronger than Russia and they have depleted their border forces to shove them into the Ukrainian meatgrinder.
→ More replies→ More replies25
u/lionseatcake 11d ago
Of course it was apparent, it was the whole point.
Country A attacks country B. Country B's allies send it resources.
Country A, "Whatre you trying to do, defeat us?"
Yes, that is literally the entire point. Also, water will get you wet and the sky is blue
→ More replies
157
u/Ok_Breadfruit_5933 11d ago
That's literally what my 5-year old nephew said last week, while playing the dumbest game of cards I've ever seen. 'But you're not letting me wiiin.'
→ More replies
33
25
118
u/BaronVonStrad317 11d ago
They snatched defeat from the jaws of victory the moment they tried to take more than Crimea.
→ More replies74
u/rugbyj 11d ago
As of 2020...
- EU undermined and dependent on Russian oil
- US in internal turmoil
- Torn apart by Brexit
- Ex-soviet states in quietly subservient to Russian influence
- Ukraine was Trumps blackmail buddy led by a hapless actor
As of 2023...
- EU focusing on arms manufacture against a common enemy, survived Winter whilst weening off Russian gas with Summer to look forward to
- US regime happily feeding their MIC new orders whilst shipping their old stuff East
- UK as ever a thorn in someone's side
- Ex-soviet states in various states of civil war and flat out mutiny
- Ukraine armed to the teeth and rallying around their war chief
→ More replies
72
54
u/Nerevarine91 11d ago
I mean… yes. I thought everyone was already being pretty clear about that. What did they think the sanctions and all the other aid to Ukraine were about?
3.4k
u/luketwo1 11d ago
West: *sends weapons to defeat russia*
Russia: YOU'RE SENDING WEAPONS TO DEFEAT US!
West: Yes?